Skip to main content

Fatherhood in the age of Protective Orders




Parenting is tough; co-parenting is tougher.  Mix in an order of protection and co-parenting develops an even deeper level of challenge. 
All 50 states and the District of Columbia have some form of protection order statutes. In Illinois, they are called Orders of Protection. 
An Order of Protection may include many different provisions, such as:
  • No Contact: This provision prohibits calling, texting, emailing, stalking, attacking, hitting, or disturbing.  “No Contact” orders may also prohibit communication through a third party.

  • No Unlawful Contact: Such a requirement permits partners to peacefully communicate for limited reasons, including arranging care or visitation for their child. 

  • Stay Away: This type of order requires one party to stay at least a certain number of yards or feet away from the other person, as well as the other person’s home, job, school, and car. The stay-away distance can vary by state or the seriousness of the situation.

  • Move Out: This order requires one party to move out of the home the couple shared.  Most often the resident who remains in the home retains temporary custody of the child or children.  The court often uses this option to minimize the disruption to children while their parents work out a more permanent agreement.

  • Firearms: The type of order requires all firearms in the home be relinquished and prohibits one party from purchasing any additional weapons until the courts have decided a more permanent path forward.

  • Counseling:  This provision orders one or both parents to attend counseling, such as batterer's intervention or anger management, alcohol or drug addiction counseling, or parenting classes. 

Orders of protection may extend to children and have conditions for visitation and/or custody.  However, orders of protection cannot address child support issues or permanent custody arrangements.  Orders of protection are temporary measures meant to create safety.  In the case of individuals who share children, situations are then referred to family court.
Orders of protection may create confusion and complication when co-parenting is required if provisions such as those listed above are not explicitly specified.
In these situations, the first step in understanding how to develop a healthy relationship with your child or children is by understanding exactly what actions or interactions are restricted through your order.  When in doubt, speak with a legal professional.  Before assuming an action would be acceptable to the court, make sure.
Think about setting up communication through software such as Talking Parent, coParenter, SmartcoParent or WeParent.  All are available for iPhone or Android; these applications allow interactions while providing other benefits such as:
  • creating a detailed record of the interactions which take place
  • sending “read” receipts and time stamps 
  • setting calendars
  • allowing third parties such as pediatricians to also send messages
Find out through the courts if Facetime or Zoom are acceptable alternatives to seeing children when you cannot be with them physically.  As state lockdowns enter their second month, virtual visits may become a reality.
However, for children under the age of 10 or for children without access to technology that allows virtual visits, other creative measures must be taken.  If your child is too young to use media or if it is inaccessible due to orders barring contact with the custodial parent, write and keep a journal of things you will share with the child once you are able to see them again.
Research events, projects, trips or crafts that you may share in the future. The most important thing to remember in times such as these is that the most effective tool in maintaining a healthy relationship with your child is the will to do so.
For other resources, please check out www.fatherhood.gov.
Chris AC, MA, CDVP and SolEK MS, CFLE, CDVP



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

China attempts "masculine" mandate

China is changing. A recent article in the NBC network on line addition discussed the case of a 13-year-old boy in Shanghai. Bu Yunhao was being bullied in his middle school, avoided on a class trip, called too girly and made fun of for the pitch of his voice when as class monitor he attempted to perform his duties. He was accused of spending too much time with girls and having alternative agendas when befriending boys. While Yunhao's classmates may have stopped bullying him, the Chinese government recently decided to define masculinity themselves. A recent announcement from the government states the government will “encourage masculinity” primarily by encouraging physical contact such as boxing. Authorities are also condemning pop cultural icons that don’t fit the prescribed mold while critics state they feel the government definition emphasizes what many consider to be outdated and damaging stereotypes for men and boys. According to an articvle published in NBC News "Boy...

Identifying Triggers for Bad Behaviors (PAIP Assignment for 5/6 and 5/7)

   There is a good reason the small piece of metal on a gun and the event or action which causes us to instantaneously react to something are both called triggers. Both can create bad outcomes and change situations for the worst in the blink of an eye. In the Ted Talk of Judson Brewer: A Simple Way to Break A Bad Habit: https://youtu.be/-moW9jvvMr4, Judson discusses the human reward-based learning system in which our memories form habits.  We use this formula to feel a certain way; reach for a comforting act; and feel rewarded. In a diet, we feel stressed, or angry, or hungry; eat a cookie; and feel satiated. In our relationships, when we feel upset because we don't feel understood, or heard, or loved; we may act in a negative way; and feel good from the momentary release of energy. Whether a cookie or a release of energy, we reinforce the behavior that a certain act i.e. eating, screaming, punching a wall or breaking a dish; is a great way to resolve a fe...

Sexual Violence in Intimate Partner Relationships: It's Not Always What You Think

Photo: Blackdoctors.org When we think about sexual violence, we typically think about cases we've seen in the news. It is not unusual to recall blatant violations that involved bold acts of complete disregard. However, when sexual violence happens in some intimate partner relationships, the bold acts that are involved are not always easily identified. Lundy Bancroft states "When people think about forced sex, they picture sexual assault. So when [abusive people force] sex through pressure or manipulation or sleep deprivation, [manipulated partners don't always] know what to call it..." ( Why Does He Do That, p. 173). It is rare for people who have not committed a brash act of sexual violence to even consider that they have been sexually abusive toward their partners. Yet, when we ponder the more subtle ways in which sexual boundaries are violated, our answers concerning whether we have violated the sexual boundaries of others may go from a definite ...